document.write('
By MIKE CORN
\x0a\x0aThe U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service once again has determined it might be prudent to include the black-tailed prairie dog on the federal endangered species list.
\x0aThe finding is preliminary, but sets the stage for a full-fledged investigation that could result in the animal receiving some type of protection.
\x0aWhile the finding was hailed by environmental groups, prairie dog opponents decried it.
\x0aIronically, the determination — made public Tuesday as part of a legal settlement — was made in part because local, state and federal agencies have done little to ensure survival of the animal.
\x0aAlso Tuesday, Logan County started the process to once again begin poisoning land where 48 endangered black-footed ferrets have been released.
\x0aTuesday’s determination by the federal wildlife agency found that since black-tailed prairie dogs were removed as a candidate for the endangered list in 2004, an all-out war has been waged against the animals by ranchers with the aid of state agricultural departments, which have approved a variety of chemicals to use.
\x0aWhile those chemicals were mentioned in the 9-page finding published in Tuesday’s Federal Register, it was the sale of zinc phosphide from South Dakota alone that was used to demonstrate the assault being waged on prairie dogs.
\x0a“To provide some prospective,” the determination states, if the United States has 2.1 million acres of prairie dog-inhabited land, “enough poison has been sold by this single facility since 2004 to poison all occupied habitat in the United States with enough remaining to poison an additional 1 million acres.”
\x0aIt’s not known how much Rozol — largely the poison of choice in Kansas — with its active ingredient of chlorophacinone or pesticides containing diphacinone has been sold.
\x0aThe direction of Tuesday’s announcement came as something of a surprise to people on both sides of the prairie dog issue.
\x0a“Wonderful,” said Ron Klataske, director of the Audubon of Kansas.
\x0aHe took particular aim at Logan County’s long-running battle against prairie dogs on the ranch complex where the highly endangered ferrets have been released.
\x0aLogan County, Klataske said, has “indirectly, if not directly, been a party to the inclusion of prairie dogs on the endangered species list.”
\x0aThat’s so, he said, because “virtually nothing has been done to follow up on implementation” of a prairie dog plan adopted by the Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks.
\x0aFormulation of that plan came in the wake of an earlier determination by federal wildlife officials that prairie dogs were endangered. The committee creating the plan included environmentalists as well as members of the ranching community.
\x0aOne of those members was Mike Beam, senior vice president of the Kansas Livestock Association.
\x0aWhile he opposes putting prairie dogs on the endangered species list, he said several proposals in the plan have not taken place.
\x0aOne of those was a change in state law, which currently requires eradication of the prairie dogs as a pest. Efforts to change the law came in 2002, but language inserted into the House bill served as a poison pill that prevented a conference committee from even meeting, Beam said.
\x0aBeam said he and the KLA would “absolutely” oppose the listing of prairie dogs as endangered.
\x0a“We’ll do all we can to keep that from being done,” he said.
\x0aBy MIKE CORN
\x0a\x0aJust hours after federal wildlife officials said prairie dogs might be endangered, several Logan County landowners were given an ultimatum.
\x0a” … Unless within the next 15 days you endeavor to exterminate the prairie dogs on your land, the county prairie dog director will be advised to proceed to eradicate the prairie dogs thereon,” the letter from Logan County Attorney Andrea Wyrick states.
\x0aIdentical letters were sent to Larry and Bette Haverfield and Gordon Barnhardt. A similar letter likely was sent to Maxine Blank, a Utah resident, who owns land the Haverfields lease.
\x0aFor the Haverfields, the letter listed 13 sections of land. The Haverfields only own 6,720 acres. Barnhardt owns about 1,500 acres next to the Haverfield complex, and Blank owns 1,740.
\x0a“There’s about 7,000 acres of prairie dogs here,” Haverfield said this morning. “And about 48 ferrets.”
\x0aWhile the letters target prairie dogs, the reintroduction of endangered black-footed ferrets has exacerbated the tension between Haverfield and Barnhardt, their neighbors and the Logan County Commission.
\x0aThose ferrets are at the heart of Larry Haverfield’s concern.
\x0a“The point I want to make is we have 48 ferrets,” he said. “It would appear to me that they may be in jeopardy.”
\x0aThe letters to Barnhardt and the Haverfields were delivered Tuesday, the same day as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service agreed black-tailed prairie dogs might deserve protection under the federal Endangered Species Act.
\x0aBarnhardt this morning said he has been in contact with Randy Rathbun, the Wichita attorney he and Haverfield have consulted with in the battle to keep the county at bay.
\x0aWhile Barnhardt said he was unsure of what legal steps Rathbun might take, he was confident a Shawnee County judge’s decision last year would be at the forefront.
\x0aIn that ruling, District Judge Charles Andrews granted a request by Logan County for a restraining order preventing Haverfield from moving cattle into areas where the county wants to poison. But, the judge also limited Logan County’s poisoning efforts to a 90-foot barrier that surrounds most of the 10,000 acres.
\x0aLogan County’s weed director poisoned some of those barriers earlier this summer, without much success, and a federal employee of the U.S. Department of Agriculture has been poisoning remaining barriers.
\x0a“I think it’s economics,” Barnhardt said of the county’s letter to start poisoning. “I think they’re hoping to recoup their investment. These guys walk around wearing Rozol caps and shirts. I suspect they have bought a lot of Rozol from this company.”
\x0a